Your EU customer's procurement team will ask for AI Act conformity proof in Q3 2026 — and you'll have 30 days to fabricate evidence that should have been generated all along.
Audit-in-a-Box™ — 7-day fixed-price audit. €3,997 founding rate. Triple-framework methodology (EU AI Act + ISO 42001 + NIST + Colorado). Now live · founding cohort open.
Each regulation = separate audit + roadmap. Bundle = save. Mid-market focus, fixed-fee transparency.
Annex III high-risk classification + Art. 11/14/50/72/99 compliance roadmap. SaaS focus.
European Accessibility Act audit for web/app — WCAG 2.1 AA + EN 301 549 compliance.
Polish e-faktura compliance audit — FA(2)/FA(3) XML + KSeF 2.0 API integration check.
Digital Operational Resilience — ICT risk + third-party register + TLPT (when applicable).
Network & Information Security audit — essential/important entity classification + risk mgmt.
AI Act + EAA + 5 PILLARS framework. Best for SaaS founders preparing for AI Act dual timeline (GPAI 02.08.2026 / Annex III 02.12.2027).
→ 5 regulations enforcement 2024-2026. Choose audit or bundle for full coverage.
EU compliance landscape 2024-2026 is 5 independent waves. Each requires a separate audit + roadmap. Most SMBs don't know:
Most SMB needs 3-4 of 5 regulations. Single audit = expensive. Bundle = realistic for mid-market.
→ Audit per regulation in 4h. Bundle saves €200-€400.
Most AI Act guidance defaults to enterprise frameworks (NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001 full deployment). That's the wrong altitude for a 50-person SaaS team facing dual timeline (GPAI 02.08.2026 / Annex III 02.12.2027).
Mid-market governance instead requires smaller deterministic control layers around critical execution points:
Documentation-of-intent vs evidence-of-enforcement. Having an AI policy ≠ having an enforced AI policy. A system may have extensive documentation and still fail governance integrity when execution behavior remains unconstrained under drift, ambiguity, or due-diligence pressure.
→ This audit identifies which pillars your current AI systems satisfy — and which become deal-killers in due diligence.
3 questions, instant result. No email capture. No sales pitch.
Social scoring by gov · real-time biometric ID in public spaces · emotion recognition in the workplace · predictive policing · facial scraping · subliminal manipulation
Employment (HR/recruitment) · credit scoring · education (admission/grading) · biometrics · critical infrastructure · law enforcement · migration · justice · healthcare
Chatbot · AI-generated content · deepfakes · emotion recognition (informational) · biometric categorization (non-prohibited)
⚠️ This quiz is a simplified guide. Full classification requires manual review per system. The full €799 audit gives you precise classification of every AI system with documentation.
Don't take my word for it. See exactly what you get in 5-7 days. Sample report: Acme HR-Tech GmbH (fictional German HR-tech, 35 emp), 3 AI systems, 11-page PDF.
Opens in new tab. Cmd-P (Mac) / Ctrl-P (Win) → Save as PDF.
Most companies think the deadline is "sometime in 2026". In reality, penalties can already be issued (prohibitions live since Feb 2, 2025).
The compliance market is bipolar: enterprise (Vanta-tier, €9-45K/yr) or DIY (€9,500+ of your time). The SMB layer is missing. My Pricora stack is reusable + Claude automation = low my cost = low your price.
Cold honest: if you have a compliance team and €10k+/yr budget — Vanta is better. If you have 100+h free per week and like reading regulations — DIY works. eucomplyhub.com is for SMB SaaS founders who have neither.
If your AI product is sold, licensed, or made available to EU users — the EU AI Act applies. No EU office required. No EU subsidiary. Just EU customers using your AI features.
It's not the €15M penalty. It's your EU customer's procurement team asking for AI Act conformity proof in Q3 2026 — and you having 30 days to fabricate evidence that should have been generated all along.
Mid-market US SaaS Series B-D with EU revenue >€10M = highest exposure. Enterprise legal teams will require conformity assessments before contract renewal.
USD billing available on request. Same audit, same deliverables, billed via Stripe in your local currency.
30-day money-back guarantee — no questions asked. All tiers include a legal disclaimer + sources.
Founding · founding cohort open · standard €5,997
Founding · standard €1,499
Per regulation · founding pricing
Founding · standard €1,199
Founding · standard €1,799
Async delivery. No sales calls, no setup overhead. Your time = 30 minutes (form + walkthrough).
Pick a package, pay via Stripe. Fill out a short form about your company and AI stack.
4 hours of work: Claude skill ai-act-audit + manual review. Annex III classification, gap analysis, roadmap.
Ready in 3-5 days. Severity ranking + fix recommendations + sources. Plus Loom video walkthrough.
High-risk → upgrade to Quick-Fix or Monitoring. Minimal/limited → relax.
Piotr Reder — solo founder, Malaga.
Just made it through the regulatory gauntlet with LocalBite (Apple DSA + EAA + Spanish autónomo). Built Pricora SaaS for Polish accountants from zero to live in 2 weeks.
15+ years in offshore industry, Anthropic Claude expertise, EU regulatory research (PL + EN markets).
Radical honesty: if someone is selling you "100% AI Act compliance" for €799 — they're lying. Compliance is a process, not a product. The €799 audit buys you clarity (classification + severity + roadmap), not insurance. Final legal sign-off always requires a lawyer.
This audit is informational and does not replace legal advice. A final compliance determination requires review by qualified EU AI Act counsel.
Penalties under Article 99 EU AI Act:
Sources (Q2 2026):
Co-developed with the people
building the enforcement layer.
The definitive wake-up call for the mid-market. This piece completely strips away the protective layer of paperwork that founders have been hiding behind ahead of August 2. An audit interview isn't a vocabulary test — it's an infrastructure inspection. If you cannot point to the exact runtime coordinates where your Article 14 oversight or Article 50 transparency thresholds are actively enforced, the policy document is just a liability anchor.
— Naimat ullah, Principal Architect, Velos Systems · 21.05.2026
fabriziosalmi/nis2-public